Archive for October, 2008

And the race for 2012 is on!

Down in the polls but certainly not out, Gov. Sarah Palin remains in the fight as the campaign enters its final week.

In an interview with ABC News’ Elizabeth Vargas, the Republican vice-presidential nominee was asked about 2012, whether she was discouraged by the daily attacks on the campaign trail, and would instead pack it in and return to her home state of Alaska.

“I think that, if I were to give up and wave a white flag of surrender against some of the political shots that we’ve taken, that would bring this whole & I’m not doing this for naught,” Palin said.

Palin said she believed in the current GOP ticket and that she was “thinking that it’s going to go our way on Tuesday, Nov. 4. I truly believe that the wisdom of the people will be revealed on that day,” she said.

Also see this live report from CNN’s Dana Bash:

This may be the ultimate jumping the shark moment for a campaign that has had more than its fair share already. Sarah Palin has essentially told the world that she’s looking out for Number 1. Expect to see another series of damaging internal campaign strife stories from former Romney aides who want to kneecap her to give their man frontrunner status for the next election.

Update: ABC News screwed up hard with the initial writeup of the article to the point where it was blatantly misleading and rapidly picked up by other news organizations. Someone seriously needs to be fired over this. Here’s the complete transcript of the exchange:

ELIZABETH VARGAS: If it doesn’t go your way on Tuesday … 2012?

GOV SARAH PALIN: I’m just … thinkin’ that it’s gonna go our way on Tuesday, November 4. I truly believe that the wisdom of … of the people will be revealed on that day. As they enter that voting booth, they will understand the stark contrast between the two tickets. …

VARGAS: But the point being that you haven’t been so bruised by some of the double standard, the sexism on the campaign trail, to say, “I’ve had it. I’m going back to Alaska.”

PALIN: Absolutely not. I think that, if I were to give up and wave a white flag of surrender against some of the political shots that we’ve taken, that … that would … bring this whole … I’m not doin’ this for naught.

Steve Clemons:

This ought to worry everyone. We’ll be under $2.00 in some parts of the country soon — and the price gougers elswhere in the country will slowly float down to these levels as well.

This is unfortunate on a number of fronts as a combination of the massive economic shocks that have hit the country and the precipitous price drop at the gas pump will be negative incentives in moving more expeditiously to alternative energy regimes.

This is an amazing story, not just for her longevity but because she lived through nearly every major civil rights milestone for African Americans in modern history. And if Obama wins the presidency next week, she will be one of the few, if not the only, voters with such an immediate generational tie to slavery to have the opportunity to vote for the country’s first African American president.

Serious wrong number

A flier sent by Michigan Democrats featuring a photo of Barack Obama that urged voters to submit an absentee ballot application includes a telephone number connecting callers to a phone sex line.

The Obama campaign takes a direct shot at Sarah Palin in a new ad:

It is rare for a campaign to directly attack their opponent’s running mate, and in fairness, the McCain campaign has been using Biden’s words against Obama. But the fact they chose to explicitly hit him on picking Sarah Palin as his running mate shows just how much of a drag they think she is on the ticket.

This seems like a pretty sweet fundraising racket. I’m not sure how ethical it is or not, but it seems to me like it’s the type of situation which could be exploited and lead to a slippery slope of corruption.

Following up on my post yesterday about Joe Lieberman losing his chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee, The Hill has this story which puts it in the context of a broader reshuffling of the Senate Democratic caucus, caused by the potential loss of at least two members to the executive branch (Obama and Biden), health issues (Byrd and Kennedy), an expanded majority depending on how many seats they pick up next week.

What happens if Stevens is re-elected next week but later resigns or is expelled from the Senate? Former defense analyst Chuck Spinney makes a very interesting point:

“How much do you want to bet the Sarah Palin won’t replace Ted Stevens after being induced to run in a special election by “popular demand”?

Hat tip to James Fallows.

James Fallows has this interesting post about how the foreign names of Barack Obama and John McCain are translated (roughly) into Chinese.

Roger Simon has an interesting note on how John McCain has failed to exploit traditional wedge issue of gun rights in this election.

The NRA is sending out anti-Obama paraphernalia on its own account, and they are one of the most effective and powerful lobby groups in Washington. But that still doesn’t carry quite the same amount of gravitas as if McCain himself – or Sarah Palin, for that matter – were making it a part of the national conversation by presenting the argument on the campaign trail or during the debates.

I don’t think a failure to seize on the gun issue will cost McCain the election, but once it’s over I think Simon is right that it will be looked at as a potential asset he didn’t capitalize on.